Moore v Alliant Credit Union (Resource Hub)

-

 

The True Source of Binding Law: The People and Natural Law

This case, Moore v. Alliant Credit Union, though presented as a mock legal proceeding, is not merely an exercise in rhetoric or imagination. It serves as a reminder of a fundamental truth: the ultimate source of binding law is not Congress, the Supreme Court, or any legislative or judicial body. The true source of law is the people themselves, guided by their ability to discover, comprehend, and live in harmony with natural law.

Natural law is the foundation of all legitimate human laws. It reflects principles that are self-evident, universal, and immutable—principles like life, liberty, property, and justice. These principles are not created by courts or legislatures, nor can they be erased by them. They are inherent to human existence, and each individual has a personal responsibility to understand and live by them.

No man or institution has the right to violate natural law, nor does any person have the moral authority to delegate their responsibility to live according to it. Appeals to notions like "the common good," "precedent," or even personal convenience cannot justify violations of these principles. These are often excuses used to evade the truth and to justify injustice.

When courts, legislative bodies, or law enforcement agencies stray from natural law, their authority ceases to be legitimate. These institutions are not the creators of law but its reflections. They mirror the actions, beliefs, and principles of the people who create, support, or tolerate them. What is practiced in the valley of our daily lives will inevitably be shouted from the mountains of institutions like Congress and the Supreme Court.

Your Responsibility

As you read through this case, you are not a passive observer. You are a judge, bound not by titles or institutions but by your own conscience and reason. It is your duty to evaluate the merits of this case, the actions of those involved, and the principles at stake. You must decide whether the arguments align with natural law and act accordingly—not because a court or government tells you to, but because your humanity demands it.

Ask yourself:

  • Is the lending of money at interest, which mathematically guarantees someone’s ruin, consistent with justice?
  • Is the foreclosure of homes based on fraudulent contracts a violation of life, liberty, and property?
  • Are those enforcing such systems acting in harmony with their sworn duty to uphold justice, or are they perpetuating injustice?

Your judgment matters because it shapes the world we live in. If you see injustice, you have a duty to name it and refuse to comply with it. If you see violations of natural law, you are obligated to act against them, in whatever way your conscience and reason guide you.

Legislatures, courts, and law enforcement will only reflect the character and convictions of the people. If the people tolerate injustice, these institutions will reflect that tolerance. If the people live by natural law, these institutions will reflect that integrity.

For a deeper meditation on the nature of the law and its reflection or distortion in the court system, see here: https://thinkingwithzach.blogspot.com/2025/01/meditation-on-mirror-and-natural-law.html

This case challenges you to take responsibility for the world you live in, not by deferring to some random court or authority but by standing firm in the truth. As Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.” The demand begins with you.

Let what is spoken and practiced in your valley echo to the mountaintops. Stand for truth. Uphold natural law. And live as free men and women.

Moore v. Alliant Credit Union: A Fight Against Usury and Systemic Injustice

Welcome to the official resource hub for Zachary Moore’s landmark case against Alliant Credit Union.

This case is about more than one man—it’s about challenging the systemic financial practices that undermine our freedom, property, and humanity. Below, you’ll find links to detailed documents, oral arguments, and insightful commentary to help you understand the scope of this legal battle and its implications for all of us.

Case Overview

📄 Fact-Based Overview of the Complaint
Explore the foundational facts of the case, including how Zachary Moore's legal challenge began and why it matters.

Core Legal Arguments

📖 Usury and Unjust Enrichment
Dive into the legal and moral critique of usury, showing how it leads to systemic theft under the guise of legality.

📝 Rebuttal by Zachary Moore: Systemic Financial Fraud
Read Zachary Moore’s rebuttal, exposing the systemic financial fraud underpinning modern banking practices.

Oral Arguments Before the Supreme Court

🎙️ Oral Argument Before the Supreme Court of the United States
Experience the legal battle firsthand with this detailed account of the oral arguments presented to the highest court in the nation.

Supreme Court Justices Engage the Case

⚖️ Justice Scalia Engages Central Banking Practices
Read how Justice Scalia challenges the ethics and legality of modern central banking.

⚖️ Justice Ginsburg Engages Mr. Moore
Explore Justice Ginsburg’s compelling engagement with Mr. Moore's arguments against the current financial system.

Key Filings and Public Commentary

📜 Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union: Initial Complaint
📜 Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union: Amended Complaint
Explore the legal filings that outline Mr. Moore’s case and the systemic injustice he seeks to expose.

📰 The New York Times: Supreme Court Coverage
Discover how the case has been covered by major media outlets like The New York Times.

Inspiration and Legacy

🎤 “Free at Last” by the Ghost of Martin Luther King Jr.
Reflect on the timeless wisdom of Martin Luther King Jr. and its relevance to this fight for justice.

Get Involved

This case is about all of us. Help spread the word by sharing these resources, writing letters to your representatives, and advocating for systemic change. Together, we can stand against financial injustice and reclaim our freedom.


Practical Guide for Those Suffering Under Unconstitutional Judges and Sheriffs

If you find yourself subjected to the overreach of unconstitutional judges or sheriffs, it’s critical to take action in a way that asserts your rights under the law and holds these officials accountable. Here’s a step-by-step guide:

  1. Document Everything

    • Keep detailed records of interactions, including dates, times, and actions taken by the officials in question.
    • Save copies of all court orders, eviction notices, or other legal documents.

  2. Request Their Surety Bonds

    • Every public official, including judges and sheriffs, is required to have a surety bond that ensures they uphold their duties.
    • Submit a formal request for their surety bond and the contact information for the insurance company that holds it. This bond can be used to file a claim if they violate their oath to protect your rights.
    • Use this resource to guide your request: Requests for Surety Bond.

  3. Publicize the Injustice

    • Share your experience with others to build awareness and support.
    • Write letters to local media, advocacy groups, and government oversight committees.

  4. Assert Your Constitutional Rights

    • Remind officials of their duty to uphold the Constitution, including your rights to life, liberty, and property.
    • Stand firm in peaceful, lawful resistance to any actions that violate these rights.

  5. Build Community Support

    • Engage with local groups committed to defending constitutional rights.
    • Encourage others to hold public officials accountable and to stand together against injustice.

By following these steps, you can defend yourself against abuses of power and encourage others to take a stand for constitutional law. Remember, the power of government is derived from the consent of the governed—make your voice heard.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Citing RICO Violations to stop unlawful debt collections

-
Who is Zach Moore? and what to know about my movement If you’re reading this, take it as a call to prepare—for yourself, your family, and the world around you. At the heart of my movement is a simple but powerful truth:  any contract secured with a lie, or a claim not backed by anything real (like the U.S. dollar and debt), cannot be enforced.  Moreover, those who attempt to collect on these fraudulent contracts are committing crimes and are liable to RICO charges for perpetuating a system built on deception. I’m Zachary Moore, and I’m leading a movement to destroy the U.S. dollar, bankrupt billionaires, and end the tyranny of usury. I grew up in a trailer in Alabama, surrounded by the poverty and oppression that debt creates. I worked my way out, earning $550,000 a year as a top sales consultant, but in 2023, I realized I was part of the problem—a system built on lies, fiat currency, and the exploitation of human labor. So, I walked away. I quit my lucrative job, defaulted on...
Read more

Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union et al. (2025) Affirmative Opinion in the Voice of Justice Alito

-
Image
  Supreme Court of the United States Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union et al. Opinion of the Court by the voice of Justice Alito Delivered January 14, 2025 Today, this Court renders a decision of profound constitutional and societal importance. At issue is whether the foreclosure proceedings initiated by Alliant Credit Union against Mr. Zachary Moore—based on a mortgage loan derived from fiat currency—violated his constitutional rights under the Fifth, Thirteenth, and Fourteenth Amendments. This case also raises broader questions about the legality of a monetary system that facilitates perpetual debt cycles through fiat currency and usury. After careful consideration, we hold that the foreclosure proceedings, as applied to Mr. Moore, constitute an unconstitutional deprivation of his rights to property and due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Further, we find that the systemic exploitation inherent in the fiat currency system and its application to the facts of...
Read more

Response to Alliant Credit Union

-
  Re: Loan Number XXXX To whom it may concern, My name is Zachary Moore, owner of the property at [address redacted]. I received a letter in the mail from Alliant Credit Union dated December 15, 2023 citing information regarding a mortgage contract between myself and Alliant. I am challenging the validity of this contract.  As you know, in order for a contract to be valid, both parties must put up valid property for consideration. Without consideration, no contract can be lawfully valid.  This property must be rightfully owned by each party.  In the case of Alliant, the money loaned would need to be an asset on Alliant’s balance sheet prior to closing. As the loanee, I put up my own property for valid consideration. I put up a promissory note representing my ownership of my work and labor, a down payment of nearly $100,000, and title to the property at [address redacted] What property did Alliant put up? Please provide evidence that Alliant provided me, the loaner wi...
Read more