Answer to Objection: "The Court Won't Recognize the Validity or Authenticity of the Case"

 Explore comprehensive materials and insightful commentary on Moore v. Alliant Credit Union by visiting this resourcehub, offering in-depth analysis and key perspectives on this critical case.

Answer to Objection: "The Court Won't Recognize the Validity or Authenticity of the Case"

Your hesitation to use Moore v. Alliant Credit Union because the court won’t recognize its validity or authenticity stems from a belief in false authority. Let’s address this systematically.

False Authority and the Role of Logic and Evidence

No institution, including a court, can claim legitimate authority if it refuses to adhere to the principles of logic, evidence, and truth. Authority is not granted by mere position or title; it is earned and sustained through adherence to objective law and justice. If a court dismisses your argument without addressing the logic behind it, it exposes its own illegitimacy.

In this case, the fabricated Supreme Court decision serves as a symbolic tool. It doesn’t need to be “real” in the institutional sense because the truth it represents is self-evident:

• Fraud is wrong.
• Contracts secured by fraud are void.
• Fiat currency, as a fabrication, cannot serve as valid consideration.

These truths stand independently of any ruling, court, or institution. The purpose of introducing Moore v. Alliant Credit Union is to force the court to confront the contradiction at the heart of its reasoning. If the court claims the case is invalid because it is fake, it must also grapple with the fact that fiat currency, a similarly fabricated construct, is the foundation of the disputed contract.

The Duty to Expose and Reject False Claims to Authority

As citizens, it is our duty to expose and reject any authority that operates without logic or evidence. Courts are meant to serve justice, not perpetuate systems of exploitation or fraud. Using Moore v. Alliant Credit Union in a courtroom exposes these systems by creating a logical trap:

1. If the court rejects the fabricated case as fake, it must also reject fiat currency for the same reason.
2. If the court accepts fiat currency as valid, it has no grounds to reject the fabricated case.

This strategy is not about deceiving the court; it’s about exposing its contradictions and compelling it to operate under the principles it claims to uphold.

Historical and Philosophical Precedent

History has shown that the greatest social and legal transformations occur when people challenge systems that have veiled their corruption in false authority. The United States itself was founded on rejecting the illegitimate authority of the British Crown. Philosophers like John Locke and legal scholars have long argued that any authority that contradicts natural law—life, liberty, and property—loses its legitimacy.

The Power of the Symbolic

The fabricated case is a symbol of defiance against a system built on pretense. It demonstrates that legitimacy does not arise from institutional recognition but from alignment with truth and justice. By using this strategy, you are actively participating in the rejection of a fraudulent system and the restoration of objective law.

What This Strategy Accomplishes

Even if the court dismisses the case, the act of presenting it exposes the fragility of the system. It forces the court, the opposition, and any observers to confront the uncomfortable truth: if the foundation of fiat currency is fraudulent, then the entire monetary system—and by extension, the legal contracts that rely on it—is built on sand.

By refusing to use this strategy, you allow the system to perpetuate unchallenged. By employing it, you demonstrate that the emperor has no clothes, revealing the void behind the supposed authority of the court and the monetary system.

---

Conclusion

The question is not whether the court will recognize the case but whether you are willing to confront and expose the lies upon which its authority rests. Using Moore v. Alliant Credit Union is an act of resistance against false authority and a step toward restoring justice. As individuals, we have the duty to reject systems that operate without logic, evidence, or truth, and this strategy is a powerful means to that end.