Sentencing for Moore v Alliant Credit Union

-

 Sentencing in the Aftermath of Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union

The verdict in the Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union case serves as a landmark for addressing systemic fraud perpetrated through financial institutions, political bodies, and enforcement mechanisms. Justice demands not only punitive measures but also comprehensive restitution and reform. Therefore, the following sentencing is issued to the Federal Reserve Network of banks, along with all complicit parties—politicians, judges, repo men, sheriffs, and any others who have engaged in defrauding people of their assets, life, and liberty:

  1. Restitution of Stolen Assets
    All fraudulent financial gains, including those obtained through usurious practices, false contracts, or the seizure of assets under deceitful pretenses, must be returned to their rightful owners. This includes the immediate restoration of homes, land, savings, and any other property unlawfully taken.

  2. Compensatory Restitution
    In addition to the full value of what was stolen, each individual or institution found guilty must compensate victims with an additional 20 percent of the value of their losses as restitution for the harm, stress, and opportunities lost due to the fraudulent practices.

  3. Abolition of Usurious Systems
    The Federal Reserve Network and all associated financial institutions must cease all practices of issuing fiat currency, charging interest on loans created out of nothing, and engaging in any form of predatory lending. All existing debts derived from such practices are to be declared null and void.

  4. Good Faith Reparations
    Each complicit entity must demonstrate tangible acts of repentance and commitment to reform. This includes funding community rebuilding efforts, creating financial literacy programs, and supporting initiatives to establish fair, equitable, and sustainable economic systems.

  5. Personal Accountability
    All individuals—politicians, judges, repo men, sheriffs, and others—who actively participated in the defrauding of citizens are to publicly acknowledge their wrongdoing and contribute to restitution efforts through their own resources, labor, or service to the communities they have harmed.

  6. Structural Reform and Oversight
    An independent community-elected council will oversee the transition to equitable financial systems. This council will have the authority to audit all financial practices and enforce measures to prevent future exploitation.

  7. Restoration of Trust and Equity
    The guilty parties must engage in public forums and reconciliation processes where they directly face the people harmed by their actions. These forums are designed to foster transparency, encourage dialogue, and rebuild trust within the community.

Rationale:
This sentencing is rooted in the principle that justice is not fully served until restitution is made and systemic changes are implemented to prevent recurrence. Those who exploited trust and manipulated systems for personal gain must now submit themselves to the collective accountability of the people. Only through sincere repentance, restitution, and reform can equity, trust, and liberty be restored to the community.

Let this case mark the beginning of a new era where integrity prevails over greed and systems are built to serve the people rather than exploit them.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Citing RICO Violations to stop unlawful debt collections

-
Who is Zach Moore? and what to know about my movement If you’re reading this, take it as a call to prepare—for yourself, your family, and the world around you. At the heart of my movement is a simple but powerful truth:  any contract secured with a lie, or a claim not backed by anything real (like the U.S. dollar and debt), cannot be enforced.  Moreover, those who attempt to collect on these fraudulent contracts are committing crimes and are liable to RICO charges for perpetuating a system built on deception. I’m Zachary Moore, and I’m leading a movement to destroy the U.S. dollar, bankrupt billionaires, and end the tyranny of usury. I grew up in a trailer in Alabama, surrounded by the poverty and oppression that debt creates. I worked my way out, earning $550,000 a year as a top sales consultant, but in 2023, I realized I was part of the problem—a system built on lies, fiat currency, and the exploitation of human labor. So, I walked away. I quit my lucrative job, defaulted on...
Read more

Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union et al. (2025) Affirmative Opinion in the Voice of Justice Alito

-
Image
  Supreme Court of the United States Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union et al. Opinion of the Court by the voice of Justice Alito Delivered January 14, 2025 Today, this Court renders a decision of profound constitutional and societal importance. At issue is whether the foreclosure proceedings initiated by Alliant Credit Union against Mr. Zachary Moore—based on a mortgage loan derived from fiat currency—violated his constitutional rights under the Fifth, Thirteenth, and Fourteenth Amendments. This case also raises broader questions about the legality of a monetary system that facilitates perpetual debt cycles through fiat currency and usury. After careful consideration, we hold that the foreclosure proceedings, as applied to Mr. Moore, constitute an unconstitutional deprivation of his rights to property and due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Further, we find that the systemic exploitation inherent in the fiat currency system and its application to the facts of...
Read more

Response to Alliant Credit Union

-
  Re: Loan Number XXXX To whom it may concern, My name is Zachary Moore, owner of the property at [address redacted]. I received a letter in the mail from Alliant Credit Union dated December 15, 2023 citing information regarding a mortgage contract between myself and Alliant. I am challenging the validity of this contract.  As you know, in order for a contract to be valid, both parties must put up valid property for consideration. Without consideration, no contract can be lawfully valid.  This property must be rightfully owned by each party.  In the case of Alliant, the money loaned would need to be an asset on Alliant’s balance sheet prior to closing. As the loanee, I put up my own property for valid consideration. I put up a promissory note representing my ownership of my work and labor, a down payment of nearly $100,000, and title to the property at [address redacted] What property did Alliant put up? Please provide evidence that Alliant provided me, the loaner wi...
Read more