Sentencing for Moore v Alliant Credit Union

Explore comprehensive materials and insightful commentary on Moore v. Alliant Credit Union by visiting this resourcehub, offering in-depth analysis and key perspectives on this critical case.

 Sentencing in the Aftermath of Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union

The verdict in the Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union case serves as a landmark for addressing systemic fraud perpetrated through financial institutions, political bodies, and enforcement mechanisms. Justice demands not only punitive measures but also comprehensive restitution and reform. Therefore, the following sentencing is issued to the Federal Reserve Network of banks, along with all complicit parties—politicians, judges, repo men, sheriffs, and any others who have engaged in defrauding people of their assets, life, and liberty:


  1. Restitution of Stolen Assets
    All fraudulent financial gains, including those obtained through usurious practices, false contracts, or the seizure of assets under deceitful pretenses, must be returned to their rightful owners. This includes the immediate restoration of homes, land, savings, and any other property unlawfully taken.

  2. Compensatory Restitution
    In addition to the full value of what was stolen, each individual or institution found guilty must compensate victims with an additional 20 percent of the value of their losses as restitution for the harm, stress, and opportunities lost due to the fraudulent practices.

  3. Abolition of Usurious Systems
    The Federal Reserve Network and all associated financial institutions must cease all practices of issuing fiat currency, charging interest on loans created out of nothing, and engaging in any form of predatory lending. All existing debts derived from such practices are to be declared null and void.

  4. Good Faith Reparations
    Each complicit entity must demonstrate tangible acts of repentance and commitment to reform. This includes funding community rebuilding efforts, creating financial literacy programs, and supporting initiatives to establish fair, equitable, and sustainable economic systems.

  5. Personal Accountability
    All individuals—politicians, judges, repo men, sheriffs, and others—who actively participated in the defrauding of citizens are to publicly acknowledge their wrongdoing and contribute to restitution efforts through their own resources, labor, or service to the communities they have harmed.

  6. Structural Reform and Oversight
    An independent community-elected council will oversee the transition to equitable financial systems. This council will have the authority to audit all financial practices and enforce measures to prevent future exploitation.

  7. Restoration of Trust and Equity
    The guilty parties must engage in public forums and reconciliation processes where they directly face the people harmed by their actions. These forums are designed to foster transparency, encourage dialogue, and rebuild trust within the community.


Rationale:
This sentencing is rooted in the principle that justice is not fully served until restitution is made and systemic changes are implemented to prevent recurrence. Those who exploited trust and manipulated systems for personal gain must now submit themselves to the collective accountability of the people. Only through sincere repentance, restitution, and reform can equity, trust, and liberty be restored to the community.

Let this case mark the beginning of a new era where integrity prevails over greed and systems are built to serve the people rather than exploit them.

Comments

  1. Not one single YouTube video has been posted talking about this, nor on Rumble. Crazy. This will soon come to light for the masses

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://youtu.be/kEgqOteDjK4?si=e_y5xA6l23yCXAjP

      Delete
    2. Sure it’s been talked about. Dr Kia showed this article weeks ago on her podcast.

      Delete
  2. It's a gem for sure.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank God for All of this happening 💖

    ReplyDelete
  4. This was a “mock” decision without basis. If you actually research the SC, that case is no where on it. I would love to be wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  5. So is this an actual scotus decision? Where can we find case number etc to give to our lawyer ?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Each institution must be found guilty it says. That means months or years in the court system. Very Few can afford attorney fees and time to see this through in hopes of the same decision so how do we get help?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Can we get a case number please I have been searching for hours they are blocking this at all cost

    ReplyDelete
  8. 2024-017613-CA-01 | Florida State, Miami-Dade County, Eleventh Circuit Court
    Was the initial court case

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union et al. (2025) Affirmative Opinion in the Voice of Justice Alito

Official Announcement Regarding Moore v. Alliant Credit Union

Moore v Alliant Credit Union (Resource Hub)