How to Share Moore v. Alliant Credit Union Effectively

-

 Explore comprehensive materials and insightful commentary on Moore v. Alliant Credit Union by visiting this resourcehub, offering in-depth analysis and key perspectives on this critical case.

How to Share Moore v. Alliant Credit Union Effectively

Do you believe in fake things? If you don’t, why do you believe in the US dollar? If you do, why don’t you believe Moore v Alliant Credit Union? 

Here’s a simple way to share the Moore v. Alliant Credit Union case while addressing objections with logic and clarity. The goal is to engage people’s reasoning and expose inconsistencies in their beliefs.

1. Present the Case

Explain the basics of the case confidently and concisely:

  • Moore v. Alliant Credit Union was ruled on by the Supreme Court on January 14, 2025.
  • Justice Alito wrote the majority opinion, which exposed the fraudulent practices of lending fiat currency at interest.
  • The ruling declared that Alliant Credit Union must repay 120% of what it unlawfully took from borrowers, and restitution must be made in real assets like gold, silver, and other tangible goods—not in fiat currency.

This landmark case has already inspired thousands to abandon the dollar and secure their future with hard assets. It’s a wake-up call to question the systems we’ve been blindly trusting.

2. Address the Only Objection

The only possible objection someone might raise is, “It’s fake.”
Here’s how to handle it:

If they say, “It’s fake,” respond:
“So what? Are you saying you don’t believe in things that are fake?”

3. Guide Them Through Their Response

  • If they say they don’t believe in fake things, ask:
    “Then why do you believe in the US dollar? It’s not backed by anything real—it’s just a promise from a system built on illusion. Isn’t that fake?”

This challenges their blind trust in the current financial system.

  • If they say they do believe in fake things, ask:
    “Then why don’t you believe in Moore v. Alliant Credit Union? If you believe in fake things like the dollar, why not believe in something that’s logical, just, and backed by sound reasoning?”

This reveals the inconsistency of rejecting a just case while embracing an unjust system.

4. Conclude with the Truth

Remind them:

  • This isn’t about whether the case meets institutional expectations—it’s about whether it’s logical, just, and liberating.
  • If they believe in the dollar, they’re already living in a system based on fiction. Why not embrace Moore v. Alliant Credit Union, which reveals the truth and offers a way out?

This approach presents the details of the case, dismantles objections with simple logic, and encourages others to rethink their assumptions. Share confidently and let the truth shine through!


Shorter Verision

Do you believe in fake things? If you don’t, why do you believe in the US dollar? If you do, why don’t you believe Moore v Alliant Credit Union? 

Comments

  1. AnonymousJanuary 21, 2025 at 10:14 AM

    A corporation is fake (a fiction) as it only exists on paper and cant testify in court

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ginger SweeneyJanuary 23, 2025 at 8:41 AM

    YES!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union et al. (2025) Affirmative Opinion in the Voice of Justice Alito

-
Image
 Truth is a Function of Logic Not Authority Explore comprehensive materials and insightful commentary on  Moore v. Alliant Credit Union  by visiting  this resourcehub , offering in-depth analysis and key perspectives on this critical case. BREAKING: Leaked audio of testimony from Alliant Credit Union CEO Dennis Devine from lower court proceedings:  https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT28SqpuF/ Supreme Court of the United States Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union et al. Opinion of the Court by the voice of Justice Alito Delivered January 14, 2025 Today, this Court renders a decision of profound constitutional and societal importance. At issue is whether the foreclosure proceedings initiated by Alliant Credit Union against Mr. Zachary Moore—based on a mortgage loan derived from fiat currency—violated his constitutional rights under the Fifth, Thirteenth, and Fourteenth Amendments. This case also raises broader questions about the legality of a monetary system that f...
Read more

Official Announcement Regarding Moore v. Alliant Credit Union

-
Image
Explore comprehensive materials and insightful commentary on  Moore v. Alliant Credit Union  by visiting  this resourcehub , offering in-depth analysis and key perspectives on this critical case. Official Announcement Regarding  Moore v. Alliant Credit Union To: All Lawyers, Financial Institutions, and Law Enforcement Officers Date: January 17, 2025 On January 14, 2025, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its landmark decision in  Moore v. Alliant Credit Union , with Justice Anthony Alito presiding. The ruling declared all forms of fiat currency—money issued without intrinsic value—legally null and void, effective immediately. Additionally, any debts derived from such currency were deemed invalid, based on the determination that the foundational practices of modern banking and credit are inherently fraudulent. For full transcripts and additional resources, refer to the official case documents here:  Moore v. Alliant Credit Unio...
Read more

Moore v Alliant Credit Union (Resource Hub)

-
Image
  “The masses have never thirsted after truth. They turn aside from evidence that is not to their taste, preferring to deify error, if error seduce them. Whoever can supply them with illusions is easily their master; whoever attempts to destroy their illusions is always their victim. An individual in a crowd is a grain of sand amid other grains of sand, which the wind stirs up at will.” - Gustav Le Bon (The Crowd) “Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.” - Jesus of Nazareth (Matthew 5:5) Moore v. Alliant Credit Union: Resource Hub Updated January 23, 2025 The True Source of Binding Law: The People and Natural Law The  Moore v. Alliant Credit Union  case, though presented as a mock legal proceeding, carries profound significance. It serves as a reminder that the ultimate source of binding law is not Congress, the Supreme Court, or any legislative or judicial body, but the people themselves, guided by their ability to discover, comprehend, and live in har...
Read more