Book Recommendation: An Enemy of the People by Henrik Ibsen

 

Book Recommendation: An Enemy of the People by Henrik Ibsen

If you’re looking for a story that resonates deeply with the challenges of standing for truth in the face of widespread opposition, Henrik Ibsen’s An Enemy of the People is essential reading. Written in 1882, this timeless Norwegian play explores themes that remain profoundly relevant in 2025—particularly in the ongoing struggle against systemic injustice, the evasion of inconvenient truths, and the moral courage required to speak out when the majority would rather stay silent.

Dr. Thomas Stockmann, the protagonist, is a scientist who discovers that the town's celebrated hot springs—a cornerstone of local commerce and pride—are poisoned and dangerous to public health. At first, he believes the townspeople will embrace this truth, despite its difficulty, and take action to protect their community. However, as the financial and reputational costs of fixing the springs become clear, the people—his neighbors, friends, and even family—turn against him.

They label him an “enemy of the people,” not because he is wrong, but because his truth disrupts their comfortable status quo. In their eyes, Stockmann’s insistence on truth becomes the greater threat, far worse than the poisoned springs themselves. His journey exposes a universal truth: it is not the disease, injustice, or corruption that most threatens communities, but the collective willingness to evade uncomfortable realities when those truths demand personal sacrifice.

---

Parallels Between Dr. Stockmann and My Struggle Against the Monetary System

The story of Dr. Stockmann mirrors my own struggle to expose the fraud, injustice, and moral decay at the heart of our modern monetary system. Like Stockmann’s discovery of the poisoned springs, my critique of the system’s foundation—usury, fiat currency, and systemic fraud—reveals an inconvenient truth: our financial “hot springs” are poisoned, benefiting a few at the expense of the many.

Initially, like Stockmann, I believed that exposing these truths would lead to reform. Surely people would want to fix a broken system, even if it meant temporary discomfort. But just as the townspeople rejected Stockmann to protect their personal interests, I’ve seen how many are willing to tolerate systemic fraud because it benefits them or because fixing it seems too costly. They turn their anger not toward the poison but toward the one holding up the mirror.

---

The Evils of Evasion: Then and Now

Ibsen’s play is a timeless exploration of the human heart and its capacity for evasion. In An Enemy of the People, the townspeople’s real sickness isn’t the poisoned springs—it’s their moral cowardice, their unwillingness to face the truth because of what it might cost them. This same sickness infects our modern monetary system, where people cling to the illusions of fiat currency and usury, knowing deep down that these systems are unjust but unwilling to confront them because the truth demands change.

As Ibsen so powerfully demonstrated, truth-tellers often become scapegoats. Those who expose uncomfortable truths—whether about poisoned springs or poisoned economies—become “enemies of the people.” But the real enemy isn’t the messenger. It’s the collective refusal to see the truth for what it is and act on it.

---

The Only True Court

In my battle to expose the injustice of the monetary system, I’m reminded of Dr. Stockmann’s realization that the court of public opinion is fickle and often corrupt. People place their faith in “courts”—institutions, authorities, and systems—that do not deliver justice because they are not rooted in truth. As I’ve said before: “What court? A building with people in it is not a place of justice if there is no truth in it. Your word ‘court’ lies. There is only one court and one judge, Jesus Christ, who repays everyone according to what they have done.”

In both An Enemy of the People and my own experience, it becomes clear that justice and truth do not depend on popularity or external validation. Truth stands on its own, even when the world labels it heresy.

---

A Message to the Cast of 2025

Ibsen’s story resonates today as much as it did in 1882. If you’ve read the play, you’ll recognize the roles being recast in Colorado in 2025:

• The townspeople: Those who would rather protect their comfort than face the truth.
• The authorities: Leaders who justify their actions by appealing to public will while perpetuating the lie.
• The whistleblower: A lone voice insisting on justice, willing to endure rejection and hostility to expose the poison.

You may find yourself wondering, as Dr. Stockmann did, “Might I be the baddie?” It’s an uncomfortable question, but it’s one that must be asked. To ignore the truth—whether about poisoned springs or a poisoned economy—doesn’t make the problem go away. It only ensures that the consequences will be far worse when the reckoning finally comes.

---

A Final Thought

An Enemy of the People is not just a story about one man against a town—it’s a timeless exploration of the battle between truth and evasion, justice and comfort, courage and cowardice. If you find yourself in the audience of this new edition, ask yourself: which role are you playing? Are you standing for truth, even when it costs you? Or are you turning against the messenger, believing the lie is easier to live with than the truth?

Dr. Stockmann’s story, like mine, reminds us that truth has no expiration date. It stands firm, waiting for those with the courage to embrace it, no matter the cost.

The Archetype of the Suffering Servant: A Final Reflection

Carl Jung articulated the archetype of the suffering servant as a universal pattern of the human psyche—a figure who bears the weight of collective evasion, ignorance, and sin in their pursuit of truth. This archetype, found in mythology, literature, and religion, represents an individual who suffers rejection and persecution for the sake of the collective’s redemption. Jung wrote, “The hero’s main feat is to overcome the monster of darkness: it is the long-hoped-for and expected triumph of consciousness over the unconscious.” (Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious).

This archetype finds its most profound expression in Isaiah’s Suffering Servant and the life of Jesus Christ in the Gospels. Isaiah prophesied about one who would be despised and rejected, unjustly condemned yet bearing the sins of many:

• “He was despised and rejected by mankind, a man of suffering, and familiar with pain. Like one from whom people hide their faces he was despised, and we held him in low esteem” (Isaiah 53:3).

Similarly, in the Gospels, Jesus embodied this role. Though innocent, He was accused, mocked, and crucified by those who could not bear the truth He revealed:

• “Pilate said to them, ‘Why? What evil has he done?’ But they shouted all the more, ‘Crucify him!’” (Mark 15:14).
• Even Pilate acknowledged His innocence: “I find no guilt in him” (John 18:38).

Yet, His innocence and truth did not save Him from the hatred of the people, who preferred their darkness over the light:

• “This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil” (John 3:19).

This same archetype—the truth-teller rejected by those who prefer the lie—finds resonance in Henrik Ibsen’s An Enemy of the People. Dr. Stockmann, much like Isaiah’s Servant or Jesus, becomes an outcast not because he is wrong, but because his truth threatens the comfort and stability of the people. When faced with the reality that their beloved springs are poisoned, the townspeople first deny the truth and then turn on Stockmann with increasing hostility. In Stockmann’s words:

• “The strongest man in the world is the man who stands most alone.”

---

Parallel Reactions: The Suffering Servant in Modern Times

This archetype is not confined to ancient scripture or 19th-century literature—it plays out today in the reactions I’ve experienced while exposing systemic fraud in the monetary system. Consider the comments I’ve received:

1. Mockery and Dismissal:

• “Lol!!! So you want other people to perform the citizen arrest? … Can’t wait for my new house at 371 Buckskin Ct!!”

This mirrors the townspeople mocking Dr. Stockmann for his perceived naivety. The laughter isn’t rooted in logic but in a desperate attempt to avoid the implications of the truth. It echoes the soldiers mocking Jesus with a crown of thorns:

• “And they mocked him, saying, ‘Hail, King of the Jews!’” (Matthew 27:29).

2. Moral Condemnation and Evasion:

• “You are not my messenger. You should not be allowed to spew lies like a serpent.”

Here, we see a classic projection of guilt and evasion. Instead of engaging with the argument, the commenter condemns the messenger, much like the religious leaders condemned Jesus as a blasphemer to distract from their own corruption.

3. Intimidation and Threats:

• “We’ve been gathering evidence, Zach. I think you forget the people of Elbert County voted for their sheriff.”

This echoes the implicit threats leveled against both Dr. Stockmann and Jesus. When truth threatens entrenched power, the response is often intimidation. Just as Pilate succumbed to the crowd’s pressure to maintain order, the commenter appeals to the sheriff's authority to discredit and silence me.

---

The Core Issue: Humanity’s Hatred of Truth

Isaiah’s Suffering Servant, Jesus Christ, Dr. Stockmann, and even my own experiences reveal a profound truth about human nature: people despise what exposes their darkness. The springs in Ibsen’s play, the monetary system of today, and the hearts of those who reject truth share the same poison: a preference for comfort over conscience, illusion over reality.

The townspeople in An Enemy of the People turned against Stockmann not because he was wrong but because his truth demanded they sacrifice their comfort and security. Similarly, Jesus said, “If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first” (John 15:18). Truth disrupts the status quo, and those who expose it often become scapegoats for a society unwilling to change.

---

Final Reflection: The Burden and Strength of the Servant

Carl Jung observed that the suffering servant archetype is ultimately a figure of transformation, one who forces the collective to confront the unconscious evils it wishes to ignore. This burden is heavy—Stockmann calls it “the strongest man who stands alone,” and Jesus bore it alone on the cross.

In my own experience, the archetype plays out in real-time: mockery, condemnation, intimidation, and evasion, all aimed at the messenger rather than the truth itself. Yet, as Jung notes, “There is no coming to consciousness without pain.” The path of the suffering servant is not an easy one, but it is necessary to bring light to the darkness and challenge the systems that perpetuate injustice.

To those who stand with the truth, the burden is great, but the calling is clear: expose the poisoned springs, reject the fraudulent systems, and endure the rejection of the crowd. The suffering servant's legacy, whether in scripture, literature, or life, is to bear the burden of truth so that others may one day awaken to it. As Stockmann concludes:

• “The majority is never right. Never, I tell you! That’s one of these lies in society that no free man can ever repeat.”

The challenge now is for each person to decide: Will you stand with the suffering servant in truth, or join the crowd in crucifying him?