Response to Attempted Contact (Elbert County Sheriff)

-

 


Mr. Tim Norton,

I am writing in response to your recent attempt to contact my wife in an effort to reach me. While I recognize that you may feel obligated to act in accordance with court orders, I must reiterate that you are operating under the color of law, enforcing actions that are both unlawful and illegitimate.

I previously sent you and David Fischer a "Notice of Revocation of Authority" on January 29, 2025, which made clear my position. I am not resistant to legitimate legal disputes where an injured party can demonstrate harm caused by me or where a valid contract can be shown to have been broken by me. However, as I have consistently demonstrated, I am the injured party in this matter. The banks involved have broken contract by issuing false promissory notes — fraudulent instruments masquerading as valid obligations.

If you choose to continue acting on behalf of a corrupt court and a fraudulent banking system rather than investigating the clear evidence of wrongdoing I have provided, you risk becoming complicit in these crimes. I have no desire for conflict, but I will hold you accountable for your actions should you persist in enforcing unlawful orders.

That said, I understand that you presently hold an advantage through these corrupted circumstances. If you insist on delivering papers to me, I will cooperate by meeting you at my mailbox on (redacted) solely to remove any pretext for further harassment. However, you should know that I will be accepting such documents strictly under duress, and I will document this fact accordingly. Any further contact or attempt to involve my wife in these matters will be viewed as harassment and coercion.

Once again, I implore the Elbert County Sheriff’s Office to fulfill its rightful duty: to investigate fraud, protect the rights and property of Elbert County’s citizens, and refuse to act as an enforcement arm for criminal financial interests.

I trust you will reflect carefully on your role in this matter. Please understand that I will not entertain any further contact except under duress and with full documentation of my unwilling participation.

Sincerely,

Zachary Moore

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union et al. (2025) Affirmative Opinion in the Voice of Justice Alito

-
Image
 Truth is a Function of Logic Not Authority Explore comprehensive materials and insightful commentary on  Moore v. Alliant Credit Union  by visiting  this resourcehub , offering in-depth analysis and key perspectives on this critical case. BREAKING: Leaked audio of testimony from Alliant Credit Union CEO Dennis Devine from lower court proceedings:  https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT28SqpuF/ Supreme Court of the United States Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union et al. Opinion of the Court by the voice of Justice Alito Delivered January 14, 2025 Today, this Court renders a decision of profound constitutional and societal importance. At issue is whether the foreclosure proceedings initiated by Alliant Credit Union against Mr. Zachary Moore—based on a mortgage loan derived from fiat currency—violated his constitutional rights under the Fifth, Thirteenth, and Fourteenth Amendments. This case also raises broader questions about the legality of a monetary system that f...
Read more

Official Announcement Regarding Moore v. Alliant Credit Union

-
Image
Explore comprehensive materials and insightful commentary on  Moore v. Alliant Credit Union  by visiting  this resourcehub , offering in-depth analysis and key perspectives on this critical case. Official Announcement Regarding  Moore v. Alliant Credit Union To: All Lawyers, Financial Institutions, and Law Enforcement Officers Date: January 17, 2025 On January 14, 2025, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its landmark decision in  Moore v. Alliant Credit Union , with Justice Anthony Alito presiding. The ruling declared all forms of fiat currency—money issued without intrinsic value—legally null and void, effective immediately. Additionally, any debts derived from such currency were deemed invalid, based on the determination that the foundational practices of modern banking and credit are inherently fraudulent. For full transcripts and additional resources, refer to the official case documents here:  Moore v. Alliant Credit Unio...
Read more

Moore v Alliant Credit Union (Resource Hub)

-
Image
  “The masses have never thirsted after truth. They turn aside from evidence that is not to their taste, preferring to deify error, if error seduce them. Whoever can supply them with illusions is easily their master; whoever attempts to destroy their illusions is always their victim. An individual in a crowd is a grain of sand amid other grains of sand, which the wind stirs up at will.” - Gustav Le Bon (The Crowd) “Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.” - Jesus of Nazareth (Matthew 5:5) Moore v. Alliant Credit Union: Resource Hub Updated January 23, 2025 The True Source of Binding Law: The People and Natural Law The  Moore v. Alliant Credit Union  case, though presented as a mock legal proceeding, carries profound significance. It serves as a reminder that the ultimate source of binding law is not Congress, the Supreme Court, or any legislative or judicial body, but the people themselves, guided by their ability to discover, comprehend, and live in har...
Read more