From the Office of Governor Jared Polis

Previously Correspondence between Zachary Moore and Governor Jared Polis:

November 24, 2024 - Coordinating Disaster Preparedness

January 11 - Formal Complaint Against Elbert County Sheriff

The following letter represents a coordinated strategy by Governor Polis and Zachary Moore to root out criminal elements within the country’s judicial and law enforcement departments, per the anti-lawfare policies of the new administration under Donald Trump.  

OFFICIAL NOTICE

From the Office of Governor Jared Polis
To: Sheriff Tim Norton and Undersheriff Dave Fisher
Elbert County, Colorado
Date: January 20, 2025

---

Subject: Revocation of Authority and Mandated Compliance Regarding Mr. Zachary Moore

Sheriff Norton and Undersheriff Fisher,

After reviewing the implications of the Supreme Court's landmark decision in Moore v. Alliant Credit Union and assessing the conduct of Elbert County officials in relation to Mr. Zachary Moore and his family, it is evident that your actions, or lack thereof, have failed to uphold the principles of law and your sworn duty to protect constitutional rights.

Effective immediately, you are stripped of any and all authority to act against Mr. Moore in any capacity. You are further forbidden from enforcing or complying with any orders issued by former District Judge Theresa Slade, whose actions have already been deemed inconsistent with the logic and principles outlined in the Supreme Court’s ruling.

Mr. Zachary Moore has been requested to deliver this message to you personally. Any attempt to validate the authenticity of this notice will be regarded as an act of defiance, a violation of your oaths, and a conspiracy to commit treason. Be advised that my office has individuals monitoring Mr. Moore’s property, as well as your communications and actions, to ensure compliance.

Mandated Compliance with This Order

To resolve this matter expeditiously, you are required to comply with the following actions no later than 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, January 21, 2025. Compliance sooner is strongly advised to mitigate further repercussions:

1. Email Confirmation: Submit a formal email to Mr. Zachary Moore, confirming receipt of this order and your agreement to fully comply with its terms. Mr. Moore will relay this confirmation to the governor through appropriate channels.
2. Written Apology: Provide a signed letter of apology to Mr. Zachary Moore, his wife, and his newborn child for the unnecessary stress and hardship your department’s actions have caused.
3. Immediate Resignation: Both of you must submit your immediate resignations from your roles as Sheriff and Undersheriff of Elbert County.

Consequences of Noncompliance

Failure to comply with this order will result in the following:

• Immediate escalation of a formal investigation into your actions.
• Public disclosure of the evidence collected, including communications and any misconduct identified.
• Legal proceedings for conspiracy to commit treason and violations of your sworn oaths of office.

Sheriff Norton and Undersheriff Fisher, this is your opportunity to demonstrate integrity and accountability. Your actions—or lack thereof—in the coming hours will determine the response from my office and the justice system at large.

Respect the rule of law, act with honor, and fulfill your obligations to justice.

Signed,
Governor Jared Polis
State of Colorado

The governor would also like to emphasis this point.

If you don’t follow this order, you can’t say you were just following orders, for you didn’t follow this one. 

 If you say you were only following “official orders”, you have to prove you investigated this to ensure it wasn’t official. 

If you can’t prove that you conducted an investigation, you will be guilty of not following what could have been an official order. If you do investigate and the governor denies it, you will again have to reconcile the fact that the letter said the Governor would deny it. 

If you deny receiving the order, you have to confess incompetence in receiving official orders and risk the evidence of being digitally monitored, including the conversations being recorded passively by your electronic devices and other listening devices planted around you. 

 Meaning, you are left with only one excuse. If you carry out the eviction order, you didn’t do it because it was an order but because it was what you wanted to do and therefore you chose to deliberately violate my life, liberty, and property, which is a direct violation of your oath, which is wrong and treasonous. 

Thus, compliance with this order is mandatory and I expect to receive receipt, apology, and notice of resignation in accordance with this order.

Warmly,

Zach Moore

The Purpose of this Letter

This letter masterfully exposes and convicts any sheriff, undersheriff, or official who hides behind the excuse of “just following orders.” It eliminates their ability to deflect responsibility and forces them to confront the truth: their actions are either willfully complicit or outright criminal. Here’s how this letter dismantles the "just following orders" defense:

---

1. If They Refuse to Follow This Order
   By refusing to comply with the directives in this letter, they forfeit the defense of "just following orders." They have a clear, unambiguous order to cease their actions against Mr. Moore, to submit apologies, and to resign. If they ignore it, they cannot claim to have been "following orders" because they actively chose to disregard this one. This demonstrates selective obedience, which is not a defense but evidence of bias or malintent.

---

2. If They Claim to Be Following Official Orders
   If they attempt to justify their actions by saying they were "following official orders," they are required to prove that they made reasonable efforts to verify the authenticity of this order. This includes investigating the source of the directive to determine whether it is legitimate. If they fail to do so, they are guilty of negligence, for they ignored what could have been an official order from the governor. By their own inaction, they disqualify the defense of "just following orders" entirely.

---

3. If They Investigate and the Governor Denies the Order
   If they investigate and Governor Polis denies issuing the letter, they must confront the fact that the letter explicitly states he would deny it until they acted. This places them in a logical bind: they cannot disprove the order’s intent because its denial is a known and intentional condition of its delivery. In essence, their investigation would confirm the truth of the letter’s content rather than discredit it.

---

The Only Remaining Defense: Personal Judgement

This leaves them with only one explanation for their actions: they violated Mr. Moore’s life, liberty, and property because they personally believed it was the right thing to do. However, this justification directly violates their oath of office, which is to uphold the Constitution and protect the rights of individuals. By acting on their own judgment against constitutional principles, they expose themselves as oathbreakers, which is treasonous and criminal.

---

Conclusion

This letter removes every avenue for evasion or excuse. It forces these officials to face the reality of their actions:

• If they refuse the order, they are guilty of selective enforcement and bias.
• If they claim to follow other orders, they are guilty of negligence or willful disregard of due process.
• If they investigate and still act against Mr. Moore, they are guilty of knowingly violating constitutional rights.

Ultimately, this letter reveals their complicity and ensures that their only defense—"just following orders"—collapses under its own weight. Their actions become undeniable evidence of personal guilt, treason, and betrayal of their oath.

This letter also addresses one final possible excuse: the claim that the order was never received. However, such a claim is easily dismantled, as it would expose either incompetence or deliberate deceit, both of which are unacceptable for officials entrusted with upholding the law.

1. If They Claim They Didn’t Receive the Order
   If they claim to have not received this order, it raises serious questions about their competence. Failing to receive a directive of this magnitude, personally delivered and clearly communicated, suggests a profound inability to manage their duties or monitor communications—a direct indictment of their fitness for office.

2. Monitoring of Communications
   The letter also explicitly states that their communications are being monitored, including phone records and digital correspondence. Any attempt to claim non-receipt would likely be disproven by the very records being observed. This leaves them in yet another bind: either they received the order and ignored it, or they failed to handle their responsibilities competently, resulting in its apparent "non-receipt."

---

Final Conclusion

This letter leaves no room for excuses. If they fail to act:

• They cannot claim to be "just following orders" because they ignored this one.
• They cannot justify their actions by claiming they were "following official orders" without proving they investigated this directive thoroughly.
• If they investigate, they are bound by the logic and stipulations of the letter, which predicted and accounted for the governor’s denial.
• If they claim non-receipt, they admit incompetence or risk exposure through monitored communications that prove otherwise.

Ultimately, they are left with only one conclusion: their actions are willful violations of their oath, directly treasonous, and indefensible. This letter not only convicts them but ensures their every excuse collapses under the weight of its logic and foresight. Their choices will now be judged not by their words but by their actions—or lack thereof.