The Collapse of the Soul: How Truth is Rejected and the Mind is Lost

Return to the Welcome Page

Return to Publications Page


The Collapse of the Soul: How Truth is Rejected and the Mind is Lost

Human beings were created to see, to know, and to align their thoughts with reality. Truth is not something we construct; it is something we recognize. Yet, throughout history, people have turned away from truth—not merely in isolated errors, but in a deliberate and sustained refusal to see. This refusal does not leave them unchanged. It reshapes the mind itself, altering the way it functions, until it collapses into a state where truth is no longer just rejected but becomes inaccessible. The result is not mere ignorance but something far worse: an intellectual and spiritual black hole, a place where thought devours itself and meaning ceases to exist.

How the Soul Collapses

The collapse of the soul does not happen all at once. It begins with small denials, seemingly harmless shifts in perception. At first, a person refuses to acknowledge a difficult truth because it is inconvenient or painful. But over time, this act of avoidance becomes a habit. Rather than adjusting one’s beliefs to fit reality, reality is ignored or distorted to fit one’s beliefs. This is the first stage of the collapse: the severing of words from reality.

Language is our means of grasping the world. When words are used properly, they serve as reflections of what is real, allowing us to think clearly and communicate truthfully. But when words are deliberately misused—when they are twisted to mean whatever is convenient rather than what is true—they cease to be tools of understanding and become instruments of deception. This deception may begin as an attempt to mislead others, but it inevitably turns inward. A person who repeatedly speaks falsehoods does not merely lie to others; they begin lying to themselves. Their words, once rooted in reality, now float untethered, reflecting nothing, leading nowhere.

At this point, the collapse accelerates. Because the mind relies on concepts to function, and concepts rely on truthful definitions, a person who corrupts language also corrupts their ability to think. They can no longer reason properly, because the words they use no longer correspond to anything real. They speak in circles, constructing elaborate justifications for why they do not have to confront reality. They argue not to discover truth, but to obscure it. They deploy sophisticated rhetoric not to illuminate, but to evade.

And as they do, they reach the final stage: blindness. No longer do they reject truth consciously; they lose the ability to recognize it at all. What once could have been corrected with a moment of humility—an admission that they had been wrong—is now beyond their power to repair. They have trained themselves to see only illusions, reflections of their own making, endlessly reinforcing themselves. They do not know that they are lost, because they have forgotten what it means to be found.

The Skeptic’s Dilemma: Recognizing the Collapse

Many will dismiss this argument outright, not because they can refute it, but because they refuse to engage with it. This refusal is itself evidence that the collapse is already underway. The surest sign that someone is approaching the black hole is that they will do anything to avoid looking at it.

They will say that the argument is “too abstract,” as if clarity is a flaw. They will insist that the issue is “more complicated” than it really is, as if complexity is a virtue in itself. They will demand alternative explanations while refusing to examine the one before them. If pressed, they will retreat into slogans, repeating empty phrases that sound profound but mean nothing. They do this not to think, but to prevent themselves from thinking.

They have already begun the process of severing words from meaning. They do not use language to discover truth; they use it to protect themselves from it. And once language is untethered from reality, there is no end to how far one can fall.

For those who doubt that such a collapse is possible, the proof is already in their own speech. Consider the way modern discourse is structured—not around the pursuit of truth, but around the avoidance of it. People do not argue to clarify; they argue to obscure. They do not speak to be understood; they speak to ensure that understanding never occurs. Their words are self-referential, looping endlessly, always leading back to themselves, never to what is real.

This is what it means to approach the black hole. It is to be caught in a spiral of thought that moves in endless circles, never escaping, never grounding itself in anything beyond its own repetitions. And just as a physical black hole distorts space and time, an intellectual black hole distorts thought and reason, until there is nothing left but a void—an endless, meaningless recursion of words that reflect only themselves.

The Way Back

There is only one way to escape this collapse: to turn back toward truth. This requires more than an intellectual adjustment; it requires humility. It requires the willingness to admit that one has been wrong, that one has participated in the corruption of language and the evasion of reality. It requires the courage to see, even when seeing is painful.

Truth is not hiding. It has never been hiding. The only thing that prevents someone from seeing it is their own refusal. The black hole is not an external force; it is self-imposed. The moment one stops running from reality, the gravitational pull of deception begins to weaken. The words that had been floating without meaning begin to realign. Thought, once tangled in endless self-referential loops, begins to move outward again, toward reality, toward meaning, toward light.

Those who do this will find that truth is not their enemy. It was never their enemy. It was only feared because it had been abandoned for so long. And when they see it again—fully, clearly—they will realize that they were never meant to live in darkness. They were meant to see.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union et al. (2025) Affirmative Opinion in the Voice of Justice Alito

Official Announcement Regarding Moore v. Alliant Credit Union

Moore v Alliant Credit Union (Resource Hub)