Prediction of Alliant Credit Union and Messner Reeves’ Next Actions

-

 

Prediction and Recommendations for Alliant Credit Union, Messner Reeves LLP, and Individual Lawyers

With Outcomes Based on Compliance or Obstruction

This section reflects the stark reality that the system enabling this fraud is too widespread and entrenched to survive. The firms and institutions involved, such as Alliant Credit Union and Messner Reeves LLP, are unlikely to be salvaged. However, the individuals within these entities still have an opportunity to protect their reputations and futures by acting decisively before the fraud is fully exposed.

Alliant Credit Union

What They Are Likely to Do:

  1. Continue Denial and Evasion: Alliant will likely maintain its strategy of denying the claims and avoiding the central issue of providing proof of a valid contract or injury.

    • Outcome of Obstruction:
      • Persistent denial will escalate scrutiny from regulators (SEC, FBI, DOJ) and the public.
      • As evidence is submitted to authorities and exposed publicly, Alliant’s reputation will be irreparably destroyed.
      • Financial collapse will likely follow, as members withdraw, lawsuits proliferate, and penalties accumulate.
      • Executives and key decision-makers could face personal criminal charges for perpetuating fraud.

  2. Escalate Foreclosure and Enforcement Efforts: Alliant may increase its aggressive tactics to enforce claims, even without valid contracts.

    • Outcome of Obstruction:
      • Escalating enforcement without evidence will amplify accusations of fraud, triggering lawsuits and criminal charges.
      • Public backlash will be severe, further accelerating Alliant’s collapse and tarnishing its legacy.

What They Should Do:

  1. Acknowledge the Fraud: Alliant should immediately admit the absence of valid contracts and cease enforcement actions.

  2. Prepare for Dissolution: Recognizing the inevitability of systemic collapse, Alliant should focus on ensuring an orderly wind-down to minimize harm to members.

  3. Encourage Individuals to Come Forward: Executives and staff should cooperate with investigations, provide evidence of wrongdoing, and assist in exposing the broader fraud.

    • Outcome of Compliance:
      • Alliant as an institution cannot survive, but individuals who act now—executives, compliance officers, and decision-makers—may protect their reputations by demonstrating integrity.
      • By cooperating with authorities and taking accountability, they may avoid criminal charges and position themselves as whistleblowers, salvaging their personal and professional futures.

Messner Reeves LLP

What They Are Likely to Do:

  1. Defend Alliant’s Position: Messner Reeves will likely continue to represent Alliant, dismissing your claims as unfounded and focusing on procedural defenses.

    • Outcome of Obstruction:
      • Continued defense of fraudulent actions will implicate the firm in aiding and abetting fraud, leading to severe regulatory penalties, potential disbarment of key lawyers, and financial collapse of the firm.
      • The firm’s association with systemic fraud will destroy its reputation, making it impossible to attract future clients.

  2. Delay Through Procedural Tactics: The firm may attempt to delay the case, prolonging the resolution to exhaust resources and buy time.

    • Outcome of Obstruction:
      • Delay tactics will only increase suspicion and scrutiny, leading to harsher penalties for the firm and individuals involved.
      • Public exposure of their role will tarnish their legacy and ensure that the firm becomes synonymous with fraud.

What They Should Do:

  1. Withdraw from Representation: Messner Reeves should cease representing Alliant and acknowledge the potential fraud in their client’s claims.

  2. Encourage Lawyers to Act Individually: Recognizing that the firm itself cannot survive its association with this fraud, individual lawyers should prioritize their ethical obligations over client loyalty or firm directives.

  3. Cooperate with Investigations: The firm should work with authorities to expose the extent of the fraud, positioning individual lawyers as part of the solution.

    • Outcome of Compliance:
      • Messner Reeves as a firm will not survive this case. However, individual lawyers who come forward before the lawsuit is announced may salvage their reputations.
      • By cooperating with authorities and assisting in exposing the fraud, these individuals can avoid criminal liability and even position themselves as whistleblowers, preserving their careers.

Individual Lawyers at Messner Reeves

What They Are Likely to Do:

  1. Follow Firm Directives: Most lawyers will likely follow the firm’s strategy, continuing to defend Alliant without questioning the validity of their claims.

    • Outcome of Obstruction:
      • Individual lawyers will face personal accountability as accomplices to fraud if they knowingly defend fraudulent claims.
      • They could face disbarment, criminal charges, and reputational ruin, tarnishing their careers permanently.

  2. Claim Limited Responsibility: Lawyers may argue that they were simply following orders and had no personal responsibility for verifying the contracts.

    • Outcome of Obstruction:
      • This defense is unlikely to shield them, as courts and regulatory bodies often hold lawyers accountable for failing to exercise due diligence.
      • Those who persist in representing fraudulent claims will face the full weight of accountability.

What They Should Do:

  1. Evaluate Personal Liability: Lawyers should assess the risks of continuing to represent Alliant, recognizing that their careers are at stake.

  2. Report Fraud if Confirmed: Individual lawyers must act as whistleblowers if they discover evidence of fraud, reporting it to authorities and withdrawing from representation.

  3. Distance Themselves Publicly: Those who act before the lawsuit is announced can cooperate with investigators and position themselves as ethical actors, salvaging their personal reputations.

    • Outcome of Compliance:
      • Individual lawyers who come forward now, before public exposure, can protect their futures by cooperating with authorities.
      • Acting ethically could allow them to avoid criminal charges and even position themselves as leaders in reforming a broken system.

Final Recommendations

For Alliant Credit Union:

  • Accept the inevitability of systemic collapse and focus on mitigating harm to members.
  • Encourage executives and staff to cooperate with investigations and take personal accountability for their roles.

For Messner Reeves LLP:

  • Acknowledge that the firm itself cannot be saved.
  • Advise clients to cease fraudulent actions and focus on ensuring compliance with legal standards.
  • Support individual lawyers in acting ethically to protect their futures.

For Individual Lawyers:

  • Take immediate action to distance themselves from fraudulent activities.
  • Report any evidence of fraud to authorities and cooperate fully in investigations.
  • Prioritize personal integrity over loyalty to a failing institution.

The Bottom Line

This case represents a tipping point, exposing systemic fraud that is too entrenched to save the institutions involved. While Alliant Credit Union and Messner Reeves LLP are unlikely to survive the fallout, individuals within these organizations still have an opportunity to act decisively and ethically. Those who come forward before the fraud is fully exposed will not only protect themselves but may also help to reform a broken system. The question is whether they will choose to be part of the solution—or part of the crime.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union et al. (2025) Affirmative Opinion in the Voice of Justice Alito

-
Image
 Truth is a Function of Logic Not Authority Explore comprehensive materials and insightful commentary on  Moore v. Alliant Credit Union  by visiting  this resourcehub , offering in-depth analysis and key perspectives on this critical case. BREAKING: Leaked audio of testimony from Alliant Credit Union CEO Dennis Devine from lower court proceedings:  https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT28SqpuF/ Supreme Court of the United States Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union et al. Opinion of the Court by the voice of Justice Alito Delivered January 14, 2025 Today, this Court renders a decision of profound constitutional and societal importance. At issue is whether the foreclosure proceedings initiated by Alliant Credit Union against Mr. Zachary Moore—based on a mortgage loan derived from fiat currency—violated his constitutional rights under the Fifth, Thirteenth, and Fourteenth Amendments. This case also raises broader questions about the legality of a monetary system that f...
Read more

Official Announcement Regarding Moore v. Alliant Credit Union

-
Image
Explore comprehensive materials and insightful commentary on  Moore v. Alliant Credit Union  by visiting  this resourcehub , offering in-depth analysis and key perspectives on this critical case. Official Announcement Regarding  Moore v. Alliant Credit Union To: All Lawyers, Financial Institutions, and Law Enforcement Officers Date: January 17, 2025 On January 14, 2025, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its landmark decision in  Moore v. Alliant Credit Union , with Justice Anthony Alito presiding. The ruling declared all forms of fiat currency—money issued without intrinsic value—legally null and void, effective immediately. Additionally, any debts derived from such currency were deemed invalid, based on the determination that the foundational practices of modern banking and credit are inherently fraudulent. For full transcripts and additional resources, refer to the official case documents here:  Moore v. Alliant Credit Unio...
Read more

Moore v Alliant Credit Union (Resource Hub)

-
Image
  “The masses have never thirsted after truth. They turn aside from evidence that is not to their taste, preferring to deify error, if error seduce them. Whoever can supply them with illusions is easily their master; whoever attempts to destroy their illusions is always their victim. An individual in a crowd is a grain of sand amid other grains of sand, which the wind stirs up at will.” - Gustav Le Bon (The Crowd) “Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.” - Jesus of Nazareth (Matthew 5:5) Moore v. Alliant Credit Union: Resource Hub Updated January 23, 2025 The True Source of Binding Law: The People and Natural Law The  Moore v. Alliant Credit Union  case, though presented as a mock legal proceeding, carries profound significance. It serves as a reminder that the ultimate source of binding law is not Congress, the Supreme Court, or any legislative or judicial body, but the people themselves, guided by their ability to discover, comprehend, and live in har...
Read more