Letter to Messner Reeves: Urgent Notification of Public Interest in Moore v. Alliant Credit Union

 Subject: Urgent Notification of Public Interest in Moore v. Alliant Credit Union

To the Law firm of Messner Reeves,

I am writing to inform you of the unprecedented and growing public interest in Moore v. Alliant Credit Union and to address the implications of this attention for Messner Reeves LLP, Alliant Credit Union, and its CEO, Dennis Devine.

1. Public Engagement and Viral Spread

The opinion of the Moore v Alliant Union Supreme Court Case that rendered all contracts secured with fiat currency invalid purportedly delivered by Justice Alito has now reached a significant global audience. From my personal social media accounts alone:

• Over this past weekend over 100,000 people have listened to the opinion of Moore v. Alliant Credit Union being read aloud.
• More than 25,000 individuals have downloaded this opinion directly.
• Engagement is not limited to a single platform or location; people from Sweden, England, and across the United States are reporting derivative sharing and further dissemination of the case across TikTok, YouTube, X, Instagram, and Facebook.

This is just from my own social media accounts, and the derivative engagement happening on other platforms and by other individuals is likely multiplying these figures exponentially. The case is rapidly going viral and capturing the attention of people worldwide. People will cite this case against banks and other fraudulent contracts in court cases coming up as early as this week.

2. Messner Reeves and Dennis Devine Under Scrutiny

As Moore v. Alliant Credit Union gains traction, the names of attorneys at Messner Reeves LLP, and Alliant Credit Union, including its executive leadership are becoming focal points in discussions. The growing awareness of your law firm’s role in this case and Dennis Devine’s leadership at Alliant Credit Union is leading to widespread public scrutiny.

The embedded truths within the Supreme Court case—particularly about the legitimacy of fiat currency and contracts secured by interest—are resonating with people on a global scale. This means the focus will not dissipate but will likely intensify, with calls for accountability directed toward all parties involved.

3. Public Awareness of the Strategy

Adding to this, people fully understand that the case is fabricated, yet they are using it as a strategic tool to expose contradictions in the legal system. They are deliberately invoking the logic of the Moore v. Alliant Credit Union opinion to challenge the validity of contracts secured by fiat currency, forcing courts into a paradox:

• If the case is fake, then they argue that fiat currency, as a fabricated form of value, is equally invalid.
• If the case is accepted, it invalidates all contracts based on fiat currency.

This strategy is spreading like wildfire, with detailed explanations posted online, including these links:

• Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union
• How to Use Moore v. Alliant Credit Union in Court
• YouTube Video
• Another YouTube video
• Moore v Alliant Buzz - TikTok video
• Moore v Alliant Buzz - TikTok video 
• Fiat is Fake TikTok Video
  
• Leaked Audio of Moore v Alliant (lower courts)
  

4. Risk of Escalation

The situation has been further exacerbated by reports that Zachary Moore has had to send his wife and three-week-old son away for their safety due to actions allegedly involving the Elbert County Sheriff and Judge Theresa Slade. People know that Messner Reeves filed the lawsuit against Zachary Moore and are continuing to uphold the eviction notice, scheduled for Wednesday January 22, 2025 (as soon as midnight!). Many people are beginning to view these developments as an attempt to intimidate or suppress the dissemination of this case as well as willful participation in an exploitative system. What happens when there is a violent altercation between Mr. Moore and a sheriff sent to evict him from his house at the request of your client? The sentiment of Luigi Mangione comes to mind…

Public sentiment is reaching a boiling point, with discussions of “citizen tribunals” and heightened demands for transparency and accountability. Any harm that comes to Mr. Moore or his family is likely to result in significant backlash and a deeper examination of the role of all parties involved.

5. Implications and Path Forward

Given the rapid viral spread and the passionate public response, this situation will not simply fade away. I strongly urge Messner Reeves LLP and Alliant Credit Union to:

• Acknowledge the Public Interest: Recognize that this case has struck a chord with a broad audience and is not merely a localized or isolated matter.
• Act Transparently: Any perception of suppression or harm will only fuel further scrutiny and public distrust. Transparency and ethical action are critical moving forward.
• Prepare for Further Attention: As the truth behind the issues raised in Moore v. Alliant Credit Union comes to light, the public's demand for accountability will only grow.

The truths embedded in this case, fabricated or not, are resonating with the public because they challenge foundational assumptions about fiat currency and interest-based systems. This momentum will likely continue to build, and it is crucial that all involved act with integrity and care in the coming days.

Sincerely,

Zachary Moore

P.s. I asked ChatGPT what Messner Reeves and Alliant Credit Union should do as soon as possible. In addition to immediately dropping the case and calling the Elbert County Sheriff’s office to cease and desist from all attempts to rob Mr. Moore of his home, this is what it had to say.

https://thinkingwithzach.blogspot.com/2025/01/what-should-messner-reeves-llp-and.html