Growing Alarm of Public Threats and the Need for Objective Law
Dear Sheriff Norton, Sheriff Fisher, and the team at Messner Reeves,
I hope this letter finds you all in good spirits, despite the swirling chaos of modern life and the unfortunate controversy surrounding my situation. I’m reaching out because, ironically enough, I find myself in a peculiar position: I’m being accused of the same types of victimless "crimes" that seem to be the basis for the actions being taken against me.
It seems that some members of the public have decided to mimic what they see as the actions of the "powerful" and "in charge." They're accusing me of offenses without evidence, proof of harm, or even a clear understanding of what injury they believe has occurred. Sound familiar?
It turns out that when institutions like the courts, law firms, and law enforcement set the tone for ignoring objective law and foundational rights, the public begins to follow that lead. People learn by example. When they see those in positions of authority disregarding basic principles of justice—like requiring actual evidence of a contract, valid proof of harm, or even the necessity of consent—they think, “Well, I guess this is how the world works now!” And history has shown us time and again that this is how societies unravel.
From my perspective, it seems like this whole situation could be cleared up pretty quickly. After all, I’ve been asking a simple question over and over again: Where is the proof of a valid contract or any actual injury? If someone could provide objective evidence of either, then we’d have something to work with. But instead, what I’m experiencing is the Elbert County Sheriff trespassing on my property and the courts issuing eviction notices without any substantiated claim of harm.
As this drags on, the real injury is happening to me—and, by extension, to the principles of justice that we’re all supposed to uphold. The public is watching, and they see the erosion of trust in law and governance in real-time. Unfortunately, when objective law fails for the sake of selfish gain or fear of criticism, there’s no peace or safety for anyone—not for me, not for you, and not for society at large.
Now, I know this might seem heavy, but I’m approaching it with as much good humor as I can muster. After all, it’s not every day you get to have a philosophical debate with sheriffs and lawyers about contract law and foundational rights! But seriously, we all have a duty here—not just me, but all of us.
The legitimacy of any institution—whether it’s a court, a law firm, or a sheriff’s office—rests on its ability to follow and uphold principles of fairness, evidence, and truth. These aren’t just abstract ideas; they’re the bedrock of civil society. Without them, we’re left with the kind of chaos that none of us wants to live in.
So, I’ll leave you with this thought: What kind of example do we want to set? Are we showing the public that justice is blind, fair, and principled? Or are we giving them a lesson in how to abandon those principles whenever it’s convenient?
I remain hopeful that we can resolve this amicably and in line with the ideals we all claim to stand for. Let’s put objective law back in the driver’s seat, provide evidence where it’s required, and ensure that everyone’s rights—including mine—are respected.
Thank you for taking the time to consider this letter. I look forward to hearing from you soon and seeing how we can bring some light and resolution to this situation.
Warm regards,
Zachary Moore
P.S. I want it to be known that I asked for this evidence of injury and contract 6 times to Alliant Credit Union via the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and was denied the request. I asked for this evidence in an affidavit provided to the court. The law requires a presumption of innocence and that the accusing party must provide proof of injury in order for the accused to be penalized. The law offices of Messner Reeves and Alliant Credit Union did not provide this, the judge Theresa Slade of the Elbert County District Court did not require this, and the sheriff’s department of Elbert County is not investigating this. Instead each party is operating (and injuring me and my family) on the presumption of guilt and evading all evidence put forth by the innocent party.
Make this right immediately!
If you need to know what proof of consideration would be consider legitimate and illegitimate, I have created an outline for you here:
Comments
Post a Comment