Correspondence with Elbert County Sheriff Tim Norton
This email was sent to the Elbert County sheriff Tim Norton after a phone call where he communicated that he had received an order to come search for a vehicle on behalf of Porsche Financial Services
Hi Tim,
Thanks for calling today and letting me know about the orders you received from Theresa Slade regarding the seizure of my property. In response, these are my documented requests:
1. Stand down and refuse to enforce any order related to any ruling based on a foreclosure, eviction, or replevin based on a banking contract. As I have shown you, I believe and have provided evidence that these contracts are fraudulent, unlawful, and unenforceable. They are instruments of theft that are defrauding the people of Elbert County of their life and property. Thus these fraudulent contracts are a direct assault on your office and your oath to protect and serve. (See simple illustration below)
2. Continue to inform me if and when you receive any order that references me.
3. Continue to inform me if and when you plan to carry out any order that references me
4. Know that I will consider any order followed in regards to the theft of my property that presumes the validity of the debt contract to be a criminal act punishable by law and/or my right to self-defense.
I understand that you believe your job is to follow orders and so I implore you to either investigate and take responsibility for the orders you are being told to follow or to resign from your office in protest to the unjust orders being issued to you.
*******
Illustration proving fraud of bank contracts
Let’s say I am a bank and I lend you and your brother each $100,000 to go buy a car and expect you each to give me back $115,000 in a year. For the purposes of this illustration, there is no other money out there and only you and your brother exists. The only way for you to pay off your $115,000 loan is for you to keep all your money and take $15,000 from your brother. The only way for your brother to pay off his loan is to keep all his money and take $15,000 from you. By loaning money at interest (which is called usury), the banks guarantee that one of you will go bankrupt and the bank didn’t do anything to deserve the right to charge interest on a loan. It’s a scheme that guarantees profits for the banks and guarantees losses for the people, not dissimilar to the operations of a casino or a Ponzi scheme.
********
This simple illustration is being played out all throughout Elbert County, Parker, Colorado, and the whole world. And the result is that under the false pretense of a legitimate contract, banks are using sheriffs departments to do their goon work of seizing the property of those who are either unable or unwilling to participate in this scheme. Furthermore, being that the theft of property is lucrative, banking interest have been able to lobby governments and become the source of funding and influence for government activities.
Consider how the federal income tax was passed along with the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 which said governments had the right to force the citizenry to pay taxes to the federal government in order to pay off the debt the federal government took out from
the privately held and privately operated Federal Reserve banking cartel. And if some people don’t pay their taxes, this government, like a bookie or a drug dealer, presumes to have the right to go “collect” via policing agencies armed with lethal weapons. And who benefits from these taxes? In 2024 the Federal Government paid $1.2 trillion in interest payments to the privately owned and privately run Federal Reserve banking system.
Do you work for the people against practices like this sheriff or do you work for the banks against the people?
Now… given these facts, which cannot be disputed, how are good, free, moral people suppose to respond? Are we supposed to just accept fraud as a way of life and the occasional call from the sheriff as a necessary evil? Are we supposed to let our society be increasingly controlled by banking and monied interests? Are we to let our governments, industries, and communities become subservient to what Frederic Bastiat referred to as Legal Plunder?
These are quotes from the legislator Frederick Bastiat writing in 1850 in his booklet titled “The Law”
“Sometimes the law defends plunder and participates in it. Sometimes the law places the whole apparatus of judges, police, prisons and gendarmes at the service of the plunderers, and treats the victim - when he defends himself - as a criminal.”
“When plunder becomes a way of life, men create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.”
There are only a handful of moments in a man’s life when he is in a position to do something important and impactful. This is one of those moments for you. If you were in my position and you knew what I knew, tell me… what would you do?
Warmly,
Zach
Resources for you if you’d like simple proof of what I’ve written you here:
Hidden Secrets of Money
Mommy where does money come from?
Explanation of Professor Richard Werner’s forensic analysis of banking practices
All Wars Are Bankers Wars
Daly v First National Bank
A time when a jury ruled against a bank
- afterwards, the justice of the peace who presided over this case was found floating in his lake
Comments
Post a Comment