How to argue for dismissal of fiat currencies in court

-

 To strengthen your argument that existing legal precedent regarding contracts and fiat currency is based on a deceptive lie, consider the following strategies:


### 1. **Historical Context**:

   - **Research Origins**: Provide historical evidence of how fiat currency came to be accepted and any controversies surrounding its adoption.

   - **Highlight Flaws**: Point out specific instances where the origins or use of fiat currency have been criticized or deemed misleading.


### 2. **Philosophical and Economic Theories**:

   - **Cite Economic Theorists**: Reference economists or philosophers who have critiqued fiat currency or the concept of intrinsic value.

   - **Alternative Models**: Present alternative economic models that challenge the validity of fiat currency and suggest different frameworks for understanding value.


### 3. **Legal and Ethical Frameworks**:

   - **Challenging Assumptions**: Argue that prevailing legal principles may rely on outdated or flawed assumptions about value and contract enforcement.

   - **Equity and Justice**: Emphasize the ethical implications of enforcing contracts based on potentially deceptive premises.


### 4. **Case Studies**:

   - **Documented Failures**: Cite specific cases where contracts based on fiat currency led to unjust outcomes, emphasizing the victims of such enforcement.

   - **Counterexamples**: Present examples where alternative forms of value (e.g., asset-backed currencies) provided better outcomes.


### 5. **Expert Testimony**:

   - **Incorporate Experts**: If possible, gather testimony or affidavits from economists, legal scholars, or historians who support your view.


### 6. **Call for Reevaluation**:

   - **Encourage Judicial Reevaluation**: Suggest that the court consider a reevaluation of established precedents in light of new understanding or evidence regarding fiat currency and contract law.

   - **Implications of Deception**: Discuss the broader implications of upholding contracts based on deceptive principles, both legally and socially.


### 7. **Legal Precedent Critique**:

   - **Critically Analyze Precedents**: Identify key cases that established the acceptance of fiat currency and analyze their reasoning to highlight any logical fallacies or oversights.


### Conclusion:

By incorporating historical context, economic theories, ethical frameworks, case studies, expert testimony, and a call for reevaluation, you can build a robust argument that challenges existing legal precedents. Focus on demonstrating a compelling narrative that connects your claims to broader themes of justice and equity.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union et al. (2025) Affirmative Opinion in the Voice of Justice Alito

-
Image
  Supreme Court of the United States Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union et al. Opinion of the Court by the voice of Justice Alito Delivered January 14, 2025 Today, this Court renders a decision of profound constitutional and societal importance. At issue is whether the foreclosure proceedings initiated by Alliant Credit Union against Mr. Zachary Moore—based on a mortgage loan derived from fiat currency—violated his constitutional rights under the Fifth, Thirteenth, and Fourteenth Amendments. This case also raises broader questions about the legality of a monetary system that facilitates perpetual debt cycles through fiat currency and usury. After careful consideration, we hold that the foreclosure proceedings, as applied to Mr. Moore, constitute an unconstitutional deprivation of his rights to property and due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Further, we find that the systemic exploitation inherent in the fiat currency system and its application to the facts of...
Read more

Citing RICO Violations to stop unlawful debt collections

-
Who is Zach Moore? and what to know about my movement If you’re reading this, take it as a call to prepare—for yourself, your family, and the world around you. At the heart of my movement is a simple but powerful truth:  any contract secured with a lie, or a claim not backed by anything real (like the U.S. dollar and debt), cannot be enforced.  Moreover, those who attempt to collect on these fraudulent contracts are committing crimes and are liable to RICO charges for perpetuating a system built on deception. I’m Zachary Moore, and I’m leading a movement to destroy the U.S. dollar, bankrupt billionaires, and end the tyranny of usury. I grew up in a trailer in Alabama, surrounded by the poverty and oppression that debt creates. I worked my way out, earning $550,000 a year as a top sales consultant, but in 2023, I realized I was part of the problem—a system built on lies, fiat currency, and the exploitation of human labor. So, I walked away. I quit my lucrative job, defaulted on...
Read more

Response to Alliant Credit Union

-
  Re: Loan Number XXXX To whom it may concern, My name is Zachary Moore, owner of the property at [address redacted]. I received a letter in the mail from Alliant Credit Union dated December 15, 2023 citing information regarding a mortgage contract between myself and Alliant. I am challenging the validity of this contract.  As you know, in order for a contract to be valid, both parties must put up valid property for consideration. Without consideration, no contract can be lawfully valid.  This property must be rightfully owned by each party.  In the case of Alliant, the money loaned would need to be an asset on Alliant’s balance sheet prior to closing. As the loanee, I put up my own property for valid consideration. I put up a promissory note representing my ownership of my work and labor, a down payment of nearly $100,000, and title to the property at [address redacted] What property did Alliant put up? Please provide evidence that Alliant provided me, the loaner wi...
Read more