Letter to the mayor

-

 Hello, 


I visited the ______ farmers market today and spoke with a couple vendors about the form of payment they were willing to accept. It’s very understandable to me that all accepted dollars in various methods (cash, credit, etc), but I was surprised and concerned that very few accepted real money like gold and silver. I wonder if you would be open to discussing with me an opportunity to educate and incentivize our community into protecting their businesses and the future of the Parker from hyperinflation and financial fraud by adding gold and silver as a form of payment. Why should businesses risk holding a currency that loses value every day they hold it when they can get paid in a form of money that gains value everyday they hold it?


For background, we as a nation have historically understood that gold and silver are money and that dollars are a claim to money, just like a car is a car and a car title is a claim to a car. Unfortunately, for over a century, our country and the banking industry has committed fraud by creating more paper and digital claims on money than actual money, resulting in the empty and inflating currency we use today and allowing those who create these claims (eg dollars) to benefit without producing anything in return. Encouraging businesses to accept real money that is not counterfeit and won’t become worthless is a sure fire way to secure our individual and collective future. I’d love to discuss this further with you and get your thoughts on how we can ensure a healthy, prosperous, and vibrant community for Colorado absent theft and fraud. 

Warmly,
Zach Moore

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union et al. (2025) Affirmative Opinion in the Voice of Justice Alito

-
Image
  Supreme Court of the United States Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union et al. Opinion of the Court by the voice of Justice Alito Delivered January 14, 2025 Today, this Court renders a decision of profound constitutional and societal importance. At issue is whether the foreclosure proceedings initiated by Alliant Credit Union against Mr. Zachary Moore—based on a mortgage loan derived from fiat currency—violated his constitutional rights under the Fifth, Thirteenth, and Fourteenth Amendments. This case also raises broader questions about the legality of a monetary system that facilitates perpetual debt cycles through fiat currency and usury. After careful consideration, we hold that the foreclosure proceedings, as applied to Mr. Moore, constitute an unconstitutional deprivation of his rights to property and due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Further, we find that the systemic exploitation inherent in the fiat currency system and its application to the facts of...
Read more

Citing RICO Violations to stop unlawful debt collections

-
Who is Zach Moore? and what to know about my movement If you’re reading this, take it as a call to prepare—for yourself, your family, and the world around you. At the heart of my movement is a simple but powerful truth:  any contract secured with a lie, or a claim not backed by anything real (like the U.S. dollar and debt), cannot be enforced.  Moreover, those who attempt to collect on these fraudulent contracts are committing crimes and are liable to RICO charges for perpetuating a system built on deception. I’m Zachary Moore, and I’m leading a movement to destroy the U.S. dollar, bankrupt billionaires, and end the tyranny of usury. I grew up in a trailer in Alabama, surrounded by the poverty and oppression that debt creates. I worked my way out, earning $550,000 a year as a top sales consultant, but in 2023, I realized I was part of the problem—a system built on lies, fiat currency, and the exploitation of human labor. So, I walked away. I quit my lucrative job, defaulted on...
Read more

Response to Alliant Credit Union

-
  Re: Loan Number XXXX To whom it may concern, My name is Zachary Moore, owner of the property at [address redacted]. I received a letter in the mail from Alliant Credit Union dated December 15, 2023 citing information regarding a mortgage contract between myself and Alliant. I am challenging the validity of this contract.  As you know, in order for a contract to be valid, both parties must put up valid property for consideration. Without consideration, no contract can be lawfully valid.  This property must be rightfully owned by each party.  In the case of Alliant, the money loaned would need to be an asset on Alliant’s balance sheet prior to closing. As the loanee, I put up my own property for valid consideration. I put up a promissory note representing my ownership of my work and labor, a down payment of nearly $100,000, and title to the property at [address redacted] What property did Alliant put up? Please provide evidence that Alliant provided me, the loaner wi...
Read more