Good People Don’t Obey Bad Laws

-

 Good people don’t obey bad laws. Bad laws aren’t obeyed by good people.


I spoke to a police officer recently and confirmed this. They don’t care if you don’t pay your taxes, default on your mortgage, drive without insurance, have an expired license plate, or speed. They might be compelled to pull you over and issue you a ticket but you can simply smile, say “thank you officer”, and then throw the ticket in the trash. 


I even told this officer about an idea I had for writing the officer that pulled me over a ticket for disturbing the peace, complete with a fine and my personal Venmo account. 


He thought this was hilarious. 


Police officers have an impossible job. They have to enforce the whole law and they know they are serving corrupt politicians. The reason most are on the force is to stop violent criminals yet often the reason criminals are violent is because of the conditions created by people obeying bad laws, resulting in poor education, poor neighborhoods, emasculated men, and corruptions. 

The reality is that any law passed has to be enforced. Most laws, because they are bad, depend on the voluntary cooperation of the masses to self-enforce. If people would simply refuse to obey bad laws, the peaceful disobedience of the people would prove that the politicians are the idiots and the people themselves are the true legislatures discerning right from wrong. 

Ironically, if people stopped obeying bad laws, there would be fewer true criminals for police officers to stop and there would be fewer wannabe tyrants in positions of power making the work of policing morally impossible. 












Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union et al. (2025) Affirmative Opinion in the Voice of Justice Alito

-
Image
  Supreme Court of the United States Zachary Moore v. Alliant Credit Union et al. Opinion of the Court by the voice of Justice Alito Delivered January 14, 2025 Today, this Court renders a decision of profound constitutional and societal importance. At issue is whether the foreclosure proceedings initiated by Alliant Credit Union against Mr. Zachary Moore—based on a mortgage loan derived from fiat currency—violated his constitutional rights under the Fifth, Thirteenth, and Fourteenth Amendments. This case also raises broader questions about the legality of a monetary system that facilitates perpetual debt cycles through fiat currency and usury. After careful consideration, we hold that the foreclosure proceedings, as applied to Mr. Moore, constitute an unconstitutional deprivation of his rights to property and due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Further, we find that the systemic exploitation inherent in the fiat currency system and its application to the facts of...
Read more

Citing RICO Violations to stop unlawful debt collections

-
Who is Zach Moore? and what to know about my movement If you’re reading this, take it as a call to prepare—for yourself, your family, and the world around you. At the heart of my movement is a simple but powerful truth:  any contract secured with a lie, or a claim not backed by anything real (like the U.S. dollar and debt), cannot be enforced.  Moreover, those who attempt to collect on these fraudulent contracts are committing crimes and are liable to RICO charges for perpetuating a system built on deception. I’m Zachary Moore, and I’m leading a movement to destroy the U.S. dollar, bankrupt billionaires, and end the tyranny of usury. I grew up in a trailer in Alabama, surrounded by the poverty and oppression that debt creates. I worked my way out, earning $550,000 a year as a top sales consultant, but in 2023, I realized I was part of the problem—a system built on lies, fiat currency, and the exploitation of human labor. So, I walked away. I quit my lucrative job, defaulted on...
Read more

Response to Alliant Credit Union

-
  Re: Loan Number XXXX To whom it may concern, My name is Zachary Moore, owner of the property at [address redacted]. I received a letter in the mail from Alliant Credit Union dated December 15, 2023 citing information regarding a mortgage contract between myself and Alliant. I am challenging the validity of this contract.  As you know, in order for a contract to be valid, both parties must put up valid property for consideration. Without consideration, no contract can be lawfully valid.  This property must be rightfully owned by each party.  In the case of Alliant, the money loaned would need to be an asset on Alliant’s balance sheet prior to closing. As the loanee, I put up my own property for valid consideration. I put up a promissory note representing my ownership of my work and labor, a down payment of nearly $100,000, and title to the property at [address redacted] What property did Alliant put up? Please provide evidence that Alliant provided me, the loaner wi...
Read more