US citizen discovers SHOCKING flaw at center of WORLD banking system. ALL debt contracts are now at risk of being ruled NULL AND VOID.
The Principle Used:
- Something for nothing is sacrifice
- Nothing for something is fraud
- Something for something is a contract
- No contract can sanction sacrifice or fraud
This principle applied to the banking system:
- Bank loans are created from nothing and used to acquire something (land titles, collateral, promises to repay)
- Therefore, banks deserve nothing in return for their nothing loans and lines of credit. Their claims for our somethings are null and void.
- Paying banks for nothing is complicity with your own sacrifice
The Winning Oral Argument
“If I stole a car and then sold it to the owner in exchange for a promise to pay me $20,000, I have no right to demand repayment. I haven’t put up valid consideration. If hostage takers trade hostages for $1M and later discover the $1M was counterfeit, they cannot cry foul in court. The hostages were not rightfully theirs to trade. Therefore, when a bank assumes ownership of a title by creating money from nothing using an accounting journal entry, they have not provided valid consideration and are therefore committing fraud. They have no right to repossess and are not owed any payments in return.”
He also created a video explaining the issue with every loan contract in existence, including the ones banks used to erroneously claim title to his ranch, Lexus, and Porsche.
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8JJCQaN/
Rather than establish fraud as the law of the land, the courts ruled in favor of the defendant, undoing a 110 year practice of fractional reserve banking in the United States and setting a historic and major precedent that will likely rule all claims of ownership by banks for assets acquired by loans as null and void on their face. The courts also ruled that any attempt of the banks to repossess any vehicles owned under the auspices of an erroneous debt contract will be considered attempted theft and be subject to the full punishment of the law.
This isn’t the first case that has been won in the United States. In 1968 a Minnesota man successfully argued this same case and retained possession of his property against the fraudulent loan claims of his bank.
Implications for this will soon spread throughout the entire banking system and will result in the entire $33 trillion in national debt to be wiped out overnight on the basis that the Federal Reserve did not put up legitimate consideration in exchange for the United States promise to replay in the form of US income tax.
Citizens are quickly contemplating how to protect their wealth and secure their survival, with many people buying long-term food, gold, silver, and ammo to protect them from those who would seek to continue practicing theft, fraud, and sacrifice.
We are entering a new era, one where the morality of need and sacrifice is being replaced by the morality of identification and cause.
References:
The Defendants Blog: https://thinkingwithzach.blogspot.com/2023/12/the-weapon-to-destroy-fed-and-all-debt.html?m=1
Inner Workings of Financial System: https://youtu.be/iFDe5kUUyT0?si=lLQ8lH-pwVmw9HbY
1968 Court Case: https://mn.gov/law-library/assets/1968-12-09judgmentanddecree_tcm1041-115904.pdf
News Coverage of 1968 Case: https://mn.gov/law-library/assets/1969-06-26affidavitofJeromeDaly_tcm1041-115941.pdf
Comments
Post a Comment